Many teachers come into the profession with great ideals about what it means to be a teacher. While many find great satisfaction being in the line, many emerge from the trenches of teaching in schools, shell shocked or even mortally wounded.

Teaching in schools has all too often been reduced largely to getting students to jump over academic hoops which get higher each year. In addition to these academic hoops, teachers are expected to meet the commercialized expectations of principals and parents. Many teachers soon find that much of the ideals of the teaching profession have become subordinated to the commercial KPIs set by school principals and parents who have been fed the idea that education is mainly about getting stellar academic results.

The mad chase after these KPIs have resulted in stressed out teachers, students and parents. In Singapore, there is a rising number of students who have been diagnosed with mental problems with the emphasis in doing well in high stakes school examinations being the number one cause of these problems. Many still have chosen to opt out by their “unconscious yet voluntary’ non-participation in these academic activities through missing school or being simply “disruptive” or “not putting in the effort”. Yet, we all believe that education should make us better.

If education is truly to be a better experience for all of us, then perhaps education should be repositioned as being part of the wellness movement where all who are connected with it, will be in the best of spiritual, mental, emotional and physical health. The teacher’s position is redefined as someone who makes everyone he or she comes into contact with, healthy. The teachers nourishes all “the sick”, back to health and grows the already “well” to become even healthier in mind, body and spirit. In doing so, the teacher, stays well too rather than become broken or maimed. This is simply because what is done will be more consistent with the ideals of being a teacher rather than just being the producer of economic units that the teacher is generally regarded as today.

In one of my posts, I highlighted Howard Rheingold’s post about the Amish and their relationship with technology. He suggested that instead of a mad rush to bring technology into our lives, we should have an ongoing conversation with technology. The cultural critic, Neil Postman, also has a similar view about technology. Postman in fact tries to make this conversation a little clearer by suggesting that we think about six questions that we should ask when a new technology is introduced. The six questions are:

• What is the problem to which this technology is a solution?
• Whose problem is it?
• What new problems might be created by solving the original problem?
• Which people and what institutions will be most seriously harmed by this new technology?
• What changes in language are being forced by these new technologies?
• What sort of people and institutions gain special economic and political power from this new technology?

In my view, the questions are meant to prevent us from rushing into implementing or using any new technology. In the field of education, these questions become all the more important because it is going to impact and area of human endeavor, that is, education, that is clearly supposed to be designed for the future. As an educator who had been part of Singapore’s well-known MasterPlan for IT in Education (MPITE) team, I have had an abiding interest in the use of ICT in schools. However, Rheingold’s and Postman’s suggestions for a conversation with ICT, have both given me cause to reflect on the use of ICT in education. I will be sharing my thoughts on the questions raised by Postman in relation to how ICT is supposed to be used in education. So do look out for them. In the meantime, click on the book cover to read Postman’s “Technopoly”.

The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” ~ George Bernard Shaw

I just discovered this quote attributed to George Bernard Shaw. I believe that he was right about communication being all too often an illusion. I am quite sure he will agree with me that all too often that what is regarded as teaching is also an illusion.

Too often what is passed off as teaching is just the talking that is done by the teacher. The real meaning of what is supposed to be taught is lost on the students. This is despite the latter’s ability to memorize, regurgitate, and do mechanical operations. Real meaning of what is taught is lost in a sea of “factlets” (see Perkins), little disparate bits of information which have little importance to the students except for some high stakes examinations.