Below are some quotes pertaining to the importance of numbers for our reflection. Have numbers distorted our perceptions of reality?

~~~

(Francis) Galton is also known as the founder of “eugenics,” a term he coined, which means the science of arranging marriage and family so as to produce the best possible offspring based  on the hereditary characteristics of the parents. He believed that anything could be measured and that statistical procedures, in particular, were the technology that could open the pathway to real knowledge about every form of human behavior. The next time you watch a televised beauty contest in which women are ranked numerically, you should remember Francis Galton, whose pathological romance with numbers began with this idiocy. Being unsatisfied with vagueness about where the most “beauty” was to be found, he constructed a “beauty map” of the British Isles… If this was not enough, he also invented a method for quantifying boredom (by counting the number of fidgets) and even proposed a statistical inquiry for determining the efficacy of prayer.

~ quoted from “Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology” by Neil Postman

~~~

Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s many recent visits abroad appears to have paid off – the 62-year-old ranked No. 32 in the inaugural list of top thinkers that mattered most this year in the latest issue of the influential Foreign Policy magazine in the United States.

~ quoted from “Anwar listed from among 100 Top Global Thinkers” by Debra Chong, The Malaysian Insider

~~~

Rainer Kalb, a veteran writer who’s spent six years at kicker, once said: “The yearning for grades is a reflex to the debates about school grades in childhood. Now you can once again get upset about what you consider an injustice.” If that’s supposed to mean that the players secretly, subconsciously wish to be graded, it’s rather been my experience that it’s the writers who secretly, subconsciously react to a childhood experience. Now they wield the power to rate and grade and classify, now they are the teachers. WTF.

~ “Making the Grade”, Soccernet by Uli Hesse

~~~

There is a sad joke about a fifth-grade teacher in a ghetto school who asked a grim Negro (sic) boy, during the course of a “science” lesson, “How many legs does a grasshopper have?” “Oh, man, he replied, “I sure wish I had your problems!”

~ quoted from “Teaching as a Subversive Activity” by Neil Postman & Charles Weingartner

~~~

Schools in a nation are viewed as factories of one national industry that produces the product to compete with that of other nations’ education systems, and henceforth should be held to the same standards and produce the same values.Further, schools are considered as businesses and test scores on a few subjects represent their profit margin – the bottom line to judge their performance. As a result, it narrows the curriculum to a few subjects considered essential for competing with others.

~ “Global Competitiveness Reinterpreted: Homogenization vs Diversification” by Yong Zhao

~~~

(Added on)

Singapore had the largest proportions of highly competent students who reached the advanced benchmark in Primary 4 Science (36%), Secondary 2 Science (32%) and Primary 4 Mathematics (41%). For Secondary 2 Mathematics, Singapore’s proportion was the 3rd highest (40%) (behind Chinese Taipei and Korea). [international medians: 7%, 3%, 5% and 2% respectively]

quoted from “Singapore Performs Well Again in Latest Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2007, Press Release from the Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore

~~~

 

The top student in this year’s Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) is a China national Qiu Biqing, 13, from  Qifa Primary School, who achieved an aggregate score of 290, with four A*s and a Distinction in Higher Chinese.

~ quoted from “Top student in PSLE this year from China”, the Temasek Review

~~~

This post was inspired by my friend, Dennis, whose intelligence is not impaired by his O levels only qualification. He compared the Singapore school system to the English Premier League (EPL).

“Test-oriented education’ refers to the factual existence in  our nation’s education of the tendency to simply prepare for tests, aim for high test scores, and blindly pursuing admission rates [to colleges or higher-level schools] while ignoring the the real needs of the student and social development. It pays attention to only a minority of the student population and neglects the majority; it emphasizes knowledge transmission but neglects moral, physical, aesthetic, and labor education, as well as the cultivation of applied abilities and psychological and emotional development; it relies on rote memorization, and mechanical drills as the primary approach, which makes learning uninteresting, hinders students from learning actively, prevents them from taking initiatives, and heavily burdens them with [an] excessive amount of course work; it uses test scores as the primary or only criterion to evaluate students, hurting their motivation and enthusiasm, squelching their creativity, and impedes their overall self-development. “Test-oriented education” violates the Education Law and Compulsory Education Law and deviates from our educational policy. Henceforth, we must take all effective measures to promote “quality education” and free elementary and secondary schools from “test-oriented education”. (Guojia Jiaowei [National Education Commission], 1997)

~Quoted from “Catching Up or Leading the Way: American Education in the Age of Globalization” by Yong Zhao

Catching Up or Leading the Way (Click here to purchase)

In my view, the statement above packs a wallop. Even the Chinese have woken up that their “test-oriented education” (I call it “examinations-centered schooling”) is bad for the students and the country. And this is a country with a a very long tradition of imperial examinations and is still very much a socialist country.

That definition of “test-oriented education” as “the factual existence in  our nation’s education of the tendency to simply prepare for tests, aim for high test scores, and blindly pursuing admission rates” definitely describes Singapore’s schooling system even today. No matter what the claims of the Ministry of Education (MOE) of Singapore. So Singapore is no different from China in this respect.

It also unequivocally condemned the test-preparation mind set. It also bravely acknowledges that it “ignores the real needs of the student”. Readers of my blog will know that I have been writing a lot about this, about what the students of today need to prepare them for the real world tomorrow. The statement from the National Education Commission is more brutal in its frankness than anything coming from the MOE. The MOE talks about making small changes most of the time because it is reluctant to admit that today the schooling system in Singapore is flawed fundamentally. Imagine how the teachers in Singapore will feel if it admits to this. Seems like a Communist country is more honest than a democratic one like Singapore. Moreover, it is coming from a country that has been able to put man in space. What about a country that has not, like Singapore.

It is interesting that if you read the statement, it well describes the Singapore system of schooling. Of course in Singapore, there are the elite schools that get to play with the “fun” and “exciting” stuff, like Obama’s daughters get in their elite school. But what about the rest of the citizens? Here again the statement above from the National Education Commission has hit it right on the nail when it said that its system has paid “attention to only a minority of the student population and neglects the majority.” The majority of the Singapore school population is regarded as “not as able” (and that is putting it mildly) as those in the elite schools. The latter gets the exciting stuff while the rest gets “the rote memorization, and mechanical drills as the primary approach” as mentioned above in the National Education Commission‘s report. The “test-oriented education” also “makes learning uninteresting, hinders students from learning actively, prevents them from taking initiatives”. This is from a Communist country where discipline and hard work in the face of traditional teacher-centered instruction. Simply incredible and radical if you think about this. It also shows how seriously aware they are of the shortcomings of their education system. In Singapore, we call it “meritocracy“.

The report also clearly spells out the effects of such a schooling system on the student population. Again, its conclusion is damning. It says that using “test scores as the primary or only criterion to evaluate students, hurting their motivation and enthusiasm, squelching their creativity, and impedes their overall self-development.” This is obvious but nobody in the MOE in Singapore wants to admit to this.

Let us also use that last line of the quote from the report  from the National Education Commission of China:

“…we must take all effective measures to promote “quality education” and free elementary and secondary schools from “test-oriented education”.

PS Prof. Yong Zhao’s book is a great read. Highly recommended. Arne Duncan should read it  too!